THE ANATOMY OF SEO CONTENT
There was a calculate, not so very long past, as SEO content writers had to
Keep a very close eye on something renowned as keyword density . Thankfully,
Persons days are ended. Well, sort of.
The perception was unadorned sufficient. Stuff a point keyword into an article, so with the intention of it
Made up a particular density of the article as a total, and the Google God would
Smile in the lead you, status your leaf distinguished, mighty and proud.
Keyword densities of 5% were ordinary, and I can even remember densities of
10% or more being bandied in this area! Think in this area it. That earnings with the intention of pro each
100 terms, the foremost keyword had to be built-in (somehow) by smallest amount 10 era.
For an article whose foremost keyword was “dog training,” the upshot would read
Something like this …
Dog trainingis the art of training dogs. Experts in dog trainingare skilled in
The art of dog training. If you are interested in dog training, at that time you must
Discover someone who is qualified in dog training, as someone not qualified in dog
Trainingwill not know much in this area dog training, and with all, it’s dog training
Expertise with the intention of you aspire. The preeminent kinds of dog trainingexperts are dog
Trainingexperts with their own dogs. Someone lacking a dog won’t know
Much in this area dog training, and won’t help you discover made known very much in this area skilled
Dog training, either.
OK, so I went a morsel overboard, here. Those 100 terms in fact contain 12
Instances of the stretch “dog training,” so that’s an model of a 12% keyword
Density. But you make the perception of solely how ludicrous it was, especially as this
Kind of gibberish dribbled on pro 500 terms. Things tamed down a bit after a while, and the last time I heard anyone
mention keyword density, they were advocating something like 2%. That, at
least, allows for much better quality of writing; including a main keyword just
twice every 100 words is much less forced, and a lot more natural.
However, it’s still far too rigid and artificial, and that leads us to the post-Panda
and post-Penguin world of SEO content writing. But first, a little history about
something known as LSI …
Things tamed down a bit after a while, and the last time I heard anyone
mention keyword density, they were advocating something like 2%. That, at
least, allows for much better quality of writing; including a main keyword just
twice every 100 words is much less forced, and a lot more natural.
However, it’s still far too rigid and artificial.
YOU CAN CHECT OUT THIS AWESOM GIG
http://www.fiverr.com/s/5wy5wp
Anatomy of seo
razablanca
#1