Jump to content

Beware from Fake SEO Gigs


jimmykrimson

Recommended Posts

I can guarantee you that all the gigs that claims on first page of Google are clear scams. I have tried several gigs and no results at all!

If you are getting some results this is due to your previous seo or quality of your articles…etc. Don’t think these sellers can bring you any good result! All of these scam artists use bots to generate bulk links. Don’t be fool to believe that they will build hundreds of manual links for 5$ or even for 50$. All are bot generated links!

Since they claim the results come at least after 1-2 months, According to Fiverr rules you are not able to claim a refund either! or at least Fiverr will not allow you to post a negative review after 30 days!

If you search the gigs for the term ‘seo’ you can find these gigs among top results!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has been mentioned by myself and others over the past few years. There is a lot of fake gigs on this platform, buyer beware. The bottom line is, if it’s too good to be true, then it’s you know it’s fake.

Honestly, i can’t get over how buyers line up for seo gigs thinking they will make a pile of $$ when in reality the result is nothing. Don’t waste your $$ on these gigs.

So, where do you find real services to increase your business? The best way is to learn to do it yourself, then you know the result is real. There’s a lot of videos on youtube that can show you how to do it yourself. But, like any other website, find out if the video is reputable or not.

Nobody, and I mean nobody will tell you all the secrets. You need to learn to do it yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s exactly what I think. There’s no way to bring any website at the top of search results within no time. All those gigs claiming such things are really just clowning around to make some extra dollars. They use automated systems to create hundreds of backlinks but all those links are worthless and actually harmful for buyer’s site.

I’m also a SEO and I always use MANUAL method and never claim anything out of my control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats correct. Google just ignores “trash / crap” links / backlinks. If this wouldn’t be so it would be to easy to kick an competitor out of the ranking, even if he offers high quality content 😉

The so called “bad SEO” is an urban legend 🙂 Trash links are just useless, nothing else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm. negative seo is not an urban legend. Why do you think Google Webmaster tools has the option to disavow links and upload disavow lists. It’s not there for the fun of it and I deal every day with sites that have been hit with negative seo and people go to extreme lengths against competitors to make sure it works and unfortunately it does. Sites then end up with a unnatural inbound links penalty and manual penalties and traffic drops off a cliff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No there is not a different reason. It’s there is disavow low quality and spammy links.That is what Google have stated and it is there in black and white if you search for it on their support site and this video states this clearly.

Please don’t post things like this when Google and their representatives have stated numerous times on youtube, on Google hangouts and at conferences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

🙂 “It´s the content, stupid”. This is the biggest and most important SEO criterion.

So if you create 1 Billion “bad back- or front or whatever -links” for the New York Times for example, what will happen? Nothing!

Thats one of the real nice things in the last years evolution in SEO: Google and Bing, “learned” to identify all these stupid techniques that worked for years.

Google “knows” very well, what kind of link is linking to what kind of link and why and how etc.

Do you remember Tag Clouds on every website with H1 codings? Completely useless for the users, but effective for SEO. As this crap is now worth nothing from the SEO point of view, you nearly don´t see tag clouds anymore.

Automated “social signals” in FB, Twitter & Co? worthless!

There are dozens of these kinds of things that are just useless now.

There are also videos, guidelines whatever about that, from Google for sure. Content is king.

Maybe you recognized, that all these “content marketing” pages created with “content guides”, the “last big SEO thing” are also kicked out step by step the last months.

Thats great, cause this kind of content, created by human content robots based on guides like “Content Guide: Five reasons why content marketing is senseless”, are mostly unreadable and boring.

Content is king. Again. Thanks Google and Co. 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can’t explain that to the old fashioned SEOs without being ran out of the building. Links are just links these days unless they are from high PA posts and pages with a low number of OBL on them.

I have my own theory on “do follow” and “no follow” links which I will keep to myself out of fear of being ostracized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These days if you call yourself an “SEO Specialist” then your clients would be right to expect for you be updated on the current trends in the search engine marketing world. Just as the SE’s evolve so should “all” SEOs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...