People end up sticking comments on ancient threads that for the most part no longer have relevancy!
I’ve seen plenty of those where people respond in March 2014 to posts made in March 2013. I think they didn’t notice the discrepancy in the years. Now the people who add things to posts ending in August 2012 just have no excuse
I agree, and I’m an offender!~ Didn’t really notice the date on the original post. But I only look at threads on the first page, occasionally 2nd page of the various forums. Do these old threads pop up in front because someone went slogging back a year(or two!!) to read it, then left a comment which is now new? Too bad old threads can’t just stay put on page 147 or whatever.
Reply to @celticmoon: Yes. I’ve seen posts from December 2012 with an “I agree” added on yesterday. Makes the thread “like new”.
Look, This shouldn’t bother you how old the thread is, your answer may help the user. However, if the thread was about something that is not relevant now, I understand.
Give every discussion the opportunity to add a comment.
Best of luck
The Creative Guys | 2014
At least all of the “Contact CS; they will or will not fix your problem within a day or a week or so” posts are always relevant.